We have seen the keystone of the Creed of
the Belgic Confessor, and discovered that its nature is no other
that the Argument that the Beast put before the court of the
sons of god on the Omniscience of God and the Deeds of the sons
of God as a single reality: “he did not commit treason against
God when making Man to eat the Fruit of the Forbidden Tree;
had God wanted Man not to eat He had but show up and stop him;
He did not show up because He wanted Man to eat, ergo, to die.
Man committed Sin by the Will of God, willingly”.
No one has to be ashamed for having been
deceived by the same Beast that deceived that Man who God Himself
formed with His own hands. Calvin, Luther, Henry the Eight and
their mates in the Work of the Destruction of the Catholic Church,
were convinced that the Devil was working on the other side.
And, indeed, it was. The Beast could not dream with breaking
Christianity in two without first opening a tremendous breach
between the Clerical Hierarchy and the nations. The Beast had
to corrupt the hierarchy in order to
move Cain and Abel back to the field of Civil War. To
proceed the beast had on its side the subjection of the Catholic
Church to the Italian families and powers, which made of the
Church their own mine of gold; we see them from the beginning
of the ninth century to the end of the fifteenth century, engaged
to the last of their breath
in that work, massacring each other in their fight for
the throne of Saint Peter. Disgusting, absolutely revolting.
Those same pontifical houses, to reign in
the Hour of the Darkness, had to deny the principle of the Liberation
of the Devil at the turn of the First Millennium, which they
did, this way working for Death by preparing the ground for
its prince. The Decree on the Liberation of the Devil had been
written and was before everybody’s eyes, why did the Italian
Pontifical houses deny the Word of God? Why did Saint Peter
deny Christ? Without the work of those Italian pontifical houses
the work of pushing to absolute corruption the Popedom
it would have been impossible to open that breach between the
Clerical Hierarchy and the nations. Thanks to those Italian
Houses the Devil had but to crown its work with its puppet,
the Renaissance’s Popes, and dress like a monk to repeat the
Drama of the Fall.
Had the Clerical Hierarchy followed the Decreed
of God, indeed Luther would have never done what he did, set
Christianity on fire. He had been deceived by the Beast, as
Adam was … with a big help from the part of the Popedom!
The Son did not take away after Peter’s denials the Clerical
Chiefdom from the Father’s Chosen, but those who took the Ring
of the Wife of the Lord to push away men and nations from His
Church, woe on all of them, the Lord will be their Judge, and
if for the soul of one man many sins are washed, what will be
God’s reward to those that with their
deeds made easier for the Devil to steal the souls of
men and nations from the Lord?
God gave to Peter Divine Power in order to
keep the Nations together. The Italian Popes and the Italian
Cardinals used that Power to become “the Holy Devil”. Who would
blame Luther and Calvin for having been blinded by the deeds
of such Popes as the renaissance’s Popes? However, the Time
of the Devil is at the end, and the Age of the Glory of the
Freedom of the sons of God is dawning. God will judge everybody,
our duty is to destroy the work of the Devil, our goal to do
the Will of God, both deeds are the same and only thing.
of Original Sin
We believe that by the disobedience of Adam original
sin has been spread through the whole human race. It is a corruption
of all nature--an inherited depravity which even infects small
infants in their mother’s womb, and the root which produces
in man every sort of sin. It is therefore so vile and enormous
in God’s sight that it is enough to condemn the human race,
and it is not abolished
or wholly uprooted even by baptism, seeing that sin constantly
boils forth as though from a contaminated spring. Nevertheless,
it is not imputed to God’s children for their condemnation but
is forgiven by his grace and mercy--not to put them to sleep
but so that the awareness of this corruption might often make
believers groan as they long to be set free from the body of
this death. Therefore we reject the error of the Pelagians
who say that this sin is nothing else than a matter of imitation.
We see the hand of the Devil in this Article on this
sentence : “Sin is not
abolished or wholly uprooted even by baptism”.
The Blood of the Immaculate Lamb of God could not
and cannot root out from men and women the part that Death won
on the soul of mankind by the Fall??
What for the Son of God came down from His Throne
and up to the Cross?
The Grace is given as Redemption of the Pain merited
by our sins; instead of death penalty the doors of Freedom get
wide open; we get free, out of the prison where the Sin put
us in; but out there the Wheels of Death keeps on turning, the
Devil keeps on working, the effect of the Sin keeps pushing
on the world along the Road to Hell, and spreading its global
Baptism is unable to work the redemption of the soul?
And this is a Christian Man who speaks?
This man dare to call himself a Christian, a disciple
of Christ, a son of God?
I doubt very much his talking in the name of the Lord.
Baptism is a personal Grace. It comes from God to
every man. The Regeneration of the Nature of the soul is given,
and with it Freedom, but the world keeps on turning. We have
been freed from Prison, we know now the effect of Sin; what
will do now, once we have been set free : get the rhythm of
the world? isolate ourselves from the world?
live our lives as the Devil doesn’t exist?
Is it right to deny the Grace received in the Baptism
in the name of those who fell in the old road which led them
to the prison from which they were set free by the Grace coming
The choice is before our eyes. This World was founded
on one wrong choice : War as Road to Civilization. Ever since
every single Nation made of War the Core of its Economy and
Power. The end of this career for World Supremacy is Global
God did not invent this End. He saw this End coming
again and again. Experience is the Source of His Wisdom, and
Wisdom the Root of His Law. The choice once made, “we will abide
by our own human law”, the End was at hand. However, Ignorance
was on our side and we were given Redemption, and with it the
Freedom coming with Grace from Baptism.
The Deeds committed before Baptism, the Blood of Christ
washes out; but on those crimes committed after having been
set free, every man and woman is responsible. The choice of
getting back to the road that led man to prison is before that
man once is back on the street. With Baptism comes the Grace,
with the Grace the Freedom and with Freedom the Power of Faith
: To be a son of God! What is saying the Confessor, that Baptism
brings not this Power with it? that Faith has to be blamed for
the World as it is? that the Grace is responsible for the existence
of the world? that we receive Freedom without the Power to resist
the temptations of this world?
reject the error of the Pelagians
who say that this sin is nothing else than a matter of imitation”.
Really, and in what name? In the impossibility of
Baptism to root out Sin from the Soul?
But the most dangerous part is the precedent paragraph:
“Nevertheless, it is not
imputed to God’s children for their condemnation but is forgiven
by his grace and mercy--not to put them to sleep but so that
the awareness of this corruption might often make believers
groan as they long to be set free from the body of this death”.
Excuse me, the Christian has to remember this impossibility,
this Imperfection of the Blood of the Lamb of God to root out
Sin from the Human Soul, in order to excuse himself when the
time comes for him to fall back on the road of Sin?
The Creed of the Confessor is based in the absolute
Failure of the redemption of Christ to root out from the Human
Soul the effect of the Fall of Man?
We read in the Book of God that the impossibility
to do so, to root out Sin from the Human Soul, sealed the Decree
of Destruction upon the Old Temple. Instead of one temple based
on the failure of man to fight back Death by his own means,
God gave us a New Temple, whose Foundation was the Power of
God in the Soul of Man to do what the Old Temple could not,
empower Man to fight back Death, Sin and the Devil, not only
in himself but in his fellow human. This Power is the Cradle
of Christian Freedom.
Baptism washed out all our Sins, and at the same time
empower us to never give way in before the Temptations of this
World, but with Freedom comes the Choice : The choice of falling
back in the old road leading to prison.
Baptism does not convert man to God to make of man
an automat incapable of making choices. The Freedom of the Image
of the Son of God’s is the higher Freedom a man can attained.
We come out from Prison, by Baptism, Pure and New, to walk on
a new road, to get back in the street, to move like a son of
God, never to listen the Devil, never to feel Temptation, rocks
on two legs, enemies of Death to the bones, the Regeneration
of the Foundation of Civilization as goal.
Only one who uses the blood of Christ to wash the
crimes he will commit in the future, and to which he gives himself
up, completely, can say that “Sin
is not abolished or wholly uprooted even by baptism”.
How can Baptism abolish Sin in those who are not baptized?
But if you have been baptized and still you are slave
of the power of Death, which is Sin, you do renegade of Christ,
to whom you accuse of being not the Lamb of God whose Divine
Blood roots out Sin from the soul of Man. This on one hand.
On the other, if you preach that the Blood of Christ
is a washing machine at your service to wash every sin you commit
after Baptism, your words comes not from God but from the Devil.
Make your choice!
We believe that--all Adam’s descendants having thus
fallen into perdition and ruin by the sin of the first man--God
showed himself to be as he is: merciful and just. He is merciful
in withdrawing and saving from this perdition those whom he,
in his eternal and unchangeable counsel, has elected and chosen
in Jesus Christ our Lord by his pure goodness, without any consideration
of their works. He is just in leaving the others in their ruin
and fall into which they plunged themselves.
We understand, they are the New Chosen, from eternity
chosen to salvation, and we are the left overs, born to ruin
and hell. Hey man, Halleluiah, don’t you worry, commit as many
sin as you can, don’t worry, you can even fuck the mother of
God, because the Precious Blood of Christ washes out every Sin.
One thing is not clear, however; why the precious
blood of Christ does not washes out the Sin of the Devil? Will
it be because the Justice of that Just God of the Confessors
springs out not from Truth but from the caprice of Power?
God is All-Powerful, right?
He can do whatever to whoever, when and how He fancies,
As a matter of fact, according to this Justice of
the “Just and Hidden God” of the Reformation, which takes from
Islam the conception of the Justice of God as Power, God may
be saving you to get you higher, and then drop you to make fall
harder, why not?
Were God’s Justice based in Might and not in Right,
Might being all about with the Justice of that “Just
God” who from eternity choose some to glory and other to ruin,
the Creation a circus of monsters, God the head of them, who
assure you that sometime in the Eternity God will get not tired
It looks like the Kingdom of God is the Kingdom of
Boredom and He needs to play Chess; you here, you there, all
right let’s begin. Don’t eat; now, you, tell him to eat. War
is on. Good. What’s next. O yes,
a temple, then put it down, a New Temple, instead of
money to wash their crimes give them Christ’s Blood. Good. Now
let’s put down the New Temple and brings many in its stead.
Good, good, what’s next?
Let’s work paragraph by paragraph :
that--all Adam’s descendants having thus fallen into perdition
and ruin by the sin of the first man--God showed himself to
be as he is: merciful and just”.
The Catholic Faith cannot be better quoted. The Reformers
were good copyists. And then they retorted their copy to make
them brand new. See this: Mercy is based on Might or on Right?
Because if on Might indeed God directed the entire Scene
of the Fall to show Himself Merciful; but if this was so, he
could not be Just.
Under no premise can be Just the mercy of an assassin
who stab the victim and then take him to the hospital. Only
the assassin can call Just that mercy. And only an assassin
can call that justice : “merciful”.
What they are talking about then the Belgic Confessors?
In the mouth of the Old Jews who killed their Messiah,
and in the Islamic preachers whose conception of God’s Justice
is based in Might, not in Right, this paragraph would sound
absolutely holy. In the ear of a son
of God, in whose soul the Justice of God is based on
Right, nor in Might, God’s Might being the defender of the Right,
this paragraph is satanic, he repeats the Argument of the Devil,
used in his own defense before the court of the sons of God.
If God shows mercy on those who he predestine to glory,
and shows His wrath on those who He predestine to ruin, how
can be accused Satan of being the Cause of the Perdition of
Mankind once God had him predestined to do what he did?
“Who can fight back the Power of God? He creates the
board, he set up the pawns, He calls on Action. Where is the
deal? What is His Justice? He condemns those who were create
for? His Justice is a joke!”.
This, in fact, is the natural, satanic speech kindled
by a Justice founded on Might.
Justice founded on Right is the Source of the Blood
“God had predestined no one to Ruin. He had created
every one to enjoy the glory of
the Freedom of a son of God. With this Freedom comes the Power
to choose the Path of the Law or the Path of Corruption. With
His Own Example and Life the First Born Son of God leads the
Road to Freedom. There is no Board, there are no pawns. Creation
of Life comes with the Right of the sons of God : Right to Freedom,
Peace, Truth, Justice, Happiness, Creativity, Brotherhood, Friendship,
Citizenship. The Might of God backs up the Right of the sons
of God : Right to be misused not. Right to be protected and
defended. Right to be told the Truth. Right to know everything.
This is the Right coming with the Creation of Life; it was to
God to take it or to leave it. He took it in His hand the Power
of Creation of Life to His Image because He loved that Right.
God doesn’t need to show Himself merciful and just,
the existence of Right implies Mercy and Justice. The Devil
brought this Need into his argument before the Court of the
sons of God in order to justify his crime against Heaven and
Earth. The Mercy and Justice of God needs no Fall to be seen.
The existence of the Right of the sons of God to Freedom at
the Image of the Son of God is the Living Expression of God’s
Mercy and Justice.
“He is merciful
in withdrawing and saving from this perdition those whom he,
in his eternal and unchangeable counsel, has elected and chosen
in Jesus Christ our Lord by his pure goodness, without any consideration
of their works”.
Always speaking about themselves, of course. They
have been saved from eternity, why bother in entering into the
vastness and deepness of the Wisdom of God? Who needs to understand
Saved, ay, ay, ay!
And when you fall, washed your soul on the precious
blood of Christ, that washing machine never breaks!
Once you have been chosen by God’s “eternal unchangeable
counsel” no matter the genocides you may commit, hey man, you
are saved, Halleluiah!
Let’s set Europe on fire, it’s cold in here! Thirty
Years’ War! That was a real fire! So what, why not few world
wars? After all God cannot change His “eternal and unchangeable”
counsel, could He?
What a joke! Creation means continual activity, action
on the run, presence in the Present, direction on the Future,
Predestination means Magic, Wizardry, no Present,
no Past, no Future, no Contact with Reality. Eternity, where
is that? God directs the full History of the Cosmos … no Work
needed, no need of Wisdom,
just Magic, from Eternity the Eternity comes. All right!
Where is the Passion of the Creator for His Creation,
the Love of the Artist for His Art, the Pleasure of the Perfectionist
who takes his work to the higher pitch?
Like their Anglican Brothers the Belgic Confessors
sees in God nothing but an Idol made of letters whose mission
is to give them gold and empire. Ergo :
“He is just
in leaving the others in their ruin and fall into which they
plunged themselves”. Of course, there is no wisdom for him
who does not want to see wisdom, there is no Right but Might
for those who aspire to Might and have in Right the restraint
of their might.
The God who is Love, where is He?
These guys took from the Bible what fit to their mind,
and the rest were word of the Devil. God is Love was a sentence
by the Antichrist, the Catholic Church, written. God is Love?
God is Might! the Almighty, isn’t He? How can we conceal that
God who is Catholic Love with that God who is Protestant Justice?
You to hell, you to heaven, you to hell too…
Why? Because am the Almighty and I have more bollocks
than you, understood?
Can I wash my sin in your son’s blood?
Again. Because you are going to hell, and only my
chosen ones have the right to use my Christ’s Blood as their
washing machine. You get it? Now, keep on going, hell is waiting.
What a wonderful world the world of the Chosen from
the eternity by the eternal and unchangeable counsel of God!
No hypocrisy can surpass their hypocrisy! At least we know this,
that in this are we need no challenge the disciples of the reformed
churches, they are the champions of Hypocrisy!
The Recovery of Fallen Man
We believe that our good God, by his marvelous wisdom
and goodness, seeing that man had plunged himself in this manner
into both physical and spiritual death and made himself completely
miserable, set out to find him, though man, trembling all over,
was fleeing from him. And he comforted him, promising to give
him his Son, born of a woman, to crush the head of the serpent,
and to make him blessed.
And they believed too, though following the “eternal
and unchangeable counsel of their
hidden God” they hid this part of their belief, that
before they came into town no man or nation had ever heard this
Of course not, from the Eternity their Hidden God
had disposed the entire Creation to serve them, make them rich,
give them empire, as the payment against their preaching to
the world this good news : the Blood of Christ is a washing
machine counting on which you may sin as much as you can’t get
rid of sinning.
What a wonderful Article, such an infinite wisdom,
and such an eternal good news! But I got to ask : Was it not
exactly that good news the one that the Popes and their Italian
Cardinals were using ever since
they turned Christ’s Blood into their own, private washing
Right, now I understand, what Luther was saying was
that he wanted that washing machine to be the Universal Washing
Machine, as it was it in the days of the primitive church, band
the roman church had monopolized to herself, the bitch!
And there he was, the chosen from Eternity, to rescue
the Washing Machine from the palace of the Vatican!
Ay, ay, ay!
So then we confess that God fulfilled the promise
which he had made to the early fathers by the mouth of his holy
prophets when he sent his only and eternal Son into the world
at the time set by him. The Son took the “form of a servant”
and was made in the “likeness of man, truly assuming a real
human nature, with all its weaknesses, except for sin”; being
conceived in the womb of the blessed virgin Mary by the power
of the Holy Spirit, without male participation. And he not only
assumed human nature as far as the body is concerned but also
a real human soul, in order that he might be a real human being.
For since the soul had been lost as well as the body he had
to assume them both to save them both together. Therefore we
confess, against the heresy of the Anabaptists who deny that
Christ assumed human flesh from his mother, that he “shared
the very flesh and blood of children”; that he is “fruit of
the loins of David”; according to the flesh; “born of the seed
of David” according to the flesh; “fruit of the womb of the
virgin Mary”; “born of a woman”; “the seed of David”; “a shoot
from the root of Jesse”; “the offspring of Judah”, having descended
from the Jews according to the flesh; “from the seed of Abraham”--
for he “assumed Abraham’s seed” and was “made like his brothers
except for sin.”
In this way he is truly our Immanuel--that is: “God
I mean, this all about the Incarnation : Jesus is
“God with us” because He was the son of David? And if, he was
not son of David, Jesus was no God?
But let’s deal with a paragraph after another.
“So then we
confess that God fulfilled the promise which he had made to
the early fathers by the mouth of his holy prophets when he
sent his only and eternal Son into the world at the time set
First thing is to see what’s new in this confession.
When one man separates from another because creed the cause
got to be found in the nature of the confession. To break with
someone who signs absolutely the same words there got to be
a different meaning in the words by both adopted as creed. The
Confessors call Antichristian the Catholicism while both sign
this same confession. Both Protestants and Catholics said the
same. The Catholics were saying this during One Thousand and
Five hundred years and the Protestants
were saying it since just then. Why to take from the
Antichristian Catholic the same confession? If I commit a crime
I am an criminal; if you commit a crime, you’re a criminal too.
In this case this logic doesn’t work. The Catholics were antichrist
for signing these words and the Protestants were not antichrist
for signing the same words. How so?
The Devil, according to the Creed in here displayed,
was a murderer because he murdered a man, and he murdered because
from the eternal and unchangeable counsel of God he was predestined
to commit that murder; however if a chosen by that “eternal
and unchangeable counsel of God” comes and do the same, once
he has been chosen the murder makes not a murderer of him, because
the eternal and unchangeable counsel of God cannot be changed;
no matter what the chosen does the eternal and unchangeable
counsel of God overrule the nature of the deed.. Right?
Ay, ay, ay!
God turned into a kind of miserable joke!
Two people sign the same confession, and upon one,
the Protestant Confessor, He rains on Paradise, and upon the
other, the Catholic Confessor, he rains on Hell! Can this be?
Nay, nay, nay!
At least that the interpretation of the confession
be as many as the confessors.
The Interpretation of the Catholic Confessor is well
known to the lovers of the sciences of History and Philosophy
: Jesus Christ is the Word of God made Flesh and Blood. No Word
of God said and read in His Book fell on the ground; every one
of them came together to form the muscles, the nerves, the brain
and the heart of Christ Jesus. He was the Avenger of the Blood
of Adam with the Axe and the Hammer in His hands to chop off
the head of the Old Snake. He was the Redeemer in whose Blood
all the sins of the World was to be forgiven. And so on and
so forth. The Old Testament was written for Him, and through
its books God was talking to His Son, spreading before His eyes
the Road to the Future of Heaven and Earth. Then came the fools,
thinking that the Ancient Testament refers to them, interpreting
the Ancient Testament as word of God to them. Were of this foolish
kind the Protestant Confessors?
Let’s find it out.
“The Son took
the “form of a servant” and was made in the “likeness of man,
truly assuming a real human nature, with all its weaknesses,
except for sin”; being conceived in the womb of the blessed
virgin Mary by the power of the Holy Spirit, without male participation”.
Two Confessors, same confession, one call antichristian
to the other, and the chosen takes as his the confession of
the antichrist catholic. If the Catholic be the antichrist why
to take his confession?
However, the chosen is denying the Catholic Confession.
The Son did not take the form of a servant, the Son took the
form of the Lord. At least, of course, that the “servants” of
God can say to the dead, “get up”, and to the blind, “see”,
and to the deaf, “hear,” and to the numb, “speak”, and to the
lame, “run”, and to the winds, “get calm”, and so on and so
Can the servants of God do that?
Wow boy, then we have to burn them all, because having
the power to do all : they reserve for themselves the Power
of the Lord.
Tell me boy, can do they that? How then, the Son came
to take the form of a servant? He came as Lord to take back
what he was stolen from Him, Mankind. This on one hand.
On the other hand, He was not made “in the likeness
of a man”, Man was made to His Likeness.
God gave us the Original, the Source of the Image
to which Man was made. The Son had not to assume a Nature strange
to Himself, because His Nature is the Original Source of the
Image to which the Man was created.
It is not for the Creator to assume the Nature of
the Creature, but for the Creature to assume the Nature of his
Creator. Man was made at the Image of the son of God, blameless,
immaculate, perfect in His love for God, Truth, Peace and Justice.
The Lord came to show us the Man, the Creature of God as the
Creator conceived Man in the Womb of His Wisdom and Omniscience.
That Man had no “weaknesses”. Ergo, the Son took no weaknesses,
no sin, because He has no weaknesses, no sin, and He was to
the Image and Likeness of He that God created us.
In this first part of the paragraph the Protestant
separates from the Catholic Confessor in order to put down the
glory of Jesus Christ, the Lord, whose Glory, according to them,
can be taken away from Him depending on the nature of His action.
Jesus is the Lord, and the Lord is God, how could Jesus Christ
be other that the One He was, the One He is?
He came as Lord, and we saw the Lord “being
conceived in the womb of the blessed virgin Mary by the power
of the Holy Spirit, without male participation”. (Quoted
from the Catholic Church Confession, no need to go further)
Then: “And he
not only assumed human nature as far as the body is concerned
but also a real human soul, in order that he might be a real
human being”. The Protestant Confessor insists in his turning
upside down the Bible. The body is the temple where the soul
abides. This soul being the Image and Likeness of the Son of
God, and that Image having being broken by the Fall, the Son,
the Original Source of the Broken Image, came to the Temple
to live in, and with His Life to restore the Image to its original
source, rescuing from the grave the soul of mankind.
A “real human being” is a son of God. Did the Son
of God, to whose Image and Likeness we all have been created,
did the Son be in the need to take the Image and likeness of
Himself? It is for us to become to His Image, and for this reason
he came into the Temple of the Body, to show us the original
of our soul, and with it to turn our bodies into abodes of sons
“For since the
soul had been lost as well as the body he had to assume them
both to save them both together”.
It is another way to put it. Let’s them give this
Therefore we confess, against
the heresy of the Anabaptists who deny that Christ assumed human
flesh from his mother, that he “shared the very flesh and blood
of children”; that he is “fruit of the loins of David”; according
to the flesh; “born of the seed of David” according to the flesh;
“fruit of the womb of the virgin Mary”; “born of a woman”; “the
seed of David”; “a shoot from the root of Jesse”; “the offspring
of Judah”, having descended from the Jews according to the flesh;
“from the seed of Abraham”-- for he “assumed Abraham’s seed”
and was “made like his brothers except for sin.”
As this is but just a repetition from the “antichristian”
Catholic Confession we pass to the next shot.
In this way he is truly our Immanuel--that
is: “God with us”.
This conclusion is taken from the Catholic Creed,
ergo, antichristian. And because it, the Confessors become antichristians